- Posts: 193
- Thank you received: 30
Progress on layout
14 years 9 months ago #5421
by eit27
Progress on layout was created by eit27
Just to so a few pics. Got a long way to go. Plus need a better a camera. I have a 4MP with minimal macro. Any suggestions. Thanks.
Ed
Ed
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5422
by eit27
Replied by eit27 on topic Re:Progress on layout
2ND
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5423
by eit27
Replied by eit27 on topic Re:Progress on layout
3rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5424
by eit27
Replied by eit27 on topic Re:Progress on layout
4th
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5431
by craZ13
Replied by craZ13 on topic Re:Progress on layout
It is hard to tell from the picture, but it looks like some nice track work. Look forward to more photos. We tend to be photo hungry here so post away!
I just got a Nikon Coolpix P60 that I like. This is my first digital camera so I'm still learning to use it, but am happy with it so far.
Jerry
I just got a Nikon Coolpix P60 that I like. This is my first digital camera so I'm still learning to use it, but am happy with it so far.
Jerry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5456
by eit27
Replied by eit27 on topic Re:Progress on layout
Here are a few pictures using natural daylight. What a difference. They are kind of blurry, I will just have to work out the details.
Ed
Ed
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5457
by eit27
Replied by eit27 on topic Re:Progress on layout
2nd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5458
by Havoc
Replied by Havoc on topic Re:Progress on layout
Big difference with natural light! You actually see the mountains in the distance And they look good. Grass also comes over fine. The first one is a bit blurry, the second one suffers from limited depth of field (the "conrail" logo on the engine in the tunnel is sharp but the second engine isn't)
For the blurr, try to get some stable support for your camera (or use the self-timer and don't hold the camera).
For the depth of field issue, if you have a zoom, use the wide-angle, wide-angle always has more depth of field. Otherwise you could try to raise the iso setting of your camera so it can use higher f numbers (this increases depth of field). Or maybe there is even a setting for this?
And they look good. Grass also comes over fine. The first one is a bit blurry, the second one suffers from limited depth of field (the "conrail" logo on the engine in the tunnel is sharp but the second engine isn't)For the blurr, try to get some stable support for your camera (or use the self-timer and don't hold the camera).
For the depth of field issue, if you have a zoom, use the wide-angle, wide-angle always has more depth of field. Otherwise you could try to raise the iso setting of your camera so it can use higher f numbers (this increases depth of field). Or maybe there is even a setting for this?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5465
by craZ13
Replied by craZ13 on topic Re:Progress on layout
Much better with the natural light. I too am learning photography so all of this advise is very welcome. The layout is coming along very well.
Jerry
Jerry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 years 9 months ago #5497
by eit27
Replied by eit27 on topic Re:Progress on layout
NW 1301
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.292 seconds
