- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
bridge clearance
- makotom01
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
13 years 11 months ago #10140
by makotom01
bridge clearance was created by makotom01
Hi folks, I am building a Marklin layout and due to size constraints the best clearance I can get is 35mm. I know the steam loco I have is ok but I am concerned about electric locos (pantographs). I am not using a catenary system. Any thoughts?
Thks. Tom
Thks. Tom
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- slugger
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 166
- Thank you received: 10
13 years 11 months ago #10142
by slugger
Replied by slugger on topic Re: bridge clearance
Hi Tom
I dont have any trains with pantigraphs but you could just increase the grade of you track to get more clearence but you would have to run shorter trains to make that work.If thats okay with you, then i think that is the easyest way for you. I hope i helped you.
Steve aka "Slugger"
I dont have any trains with pantigraphs but you could just increase the grade of you track to get more clearence but you would have to run shorter trains to make that work.If thats okay with you, then i think that is the easyest way for you. I hope i helped you.
Steve aka "Slugger"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ausman2001
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 278
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 11 months ago #10143
by ausman2001
Replied by ausman2001 on topic Re: bridge clearance
Hi Tom. I just checked out an 8811 with fully extended pantographs (I'm not using catenary either), siting on track which is on cork roadbed. From the base level to the top of the pantographs is about 33mm, so with your 35mm clearance you'll juuuuuust make it.
What grades will you have? Marklin says 4% is OK, but that's only with short trains. If you want to run, say, four D-Zug coaches you'd be better off with no more than 2%. I found this out the hard way
What grades will you have? Marklin says 4% is OK, but that's only with short trains. If you want to run, say, four D-Zug coaches you'd be better off with no more than 2%. I found this out the hard way
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- makotom01
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 9
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 11 months ago #10144
by makotom01
Replied by makotom01 on topic Re: bridge clearance
Thanks for your help. Is your 33mm measured from the track? I am running 3.5% grade with the 35mm from track to underside of the bridge. Again thank you all for your help.
Tom
Tom
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- agarpin
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 11 months ago #10146
by agarpin
Replied by agarpin on topic Re: bridge clearance
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ausman2001
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 278
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 11 months ago #10150
by ausman2001
Replied by ausman2001 on topic Re: bridge clearance
makotom01 wrote:
The 33mm was measured from the baseboard level to the tops of the pantographs. When I reported that I was forgetting that the measurements didn't start from the end of the ruler, so the clearance you've actually got is about 9mm. Should be plenty.
Thanks for your help. Is your 33mm measured from the track? I am running 3.5% grade with the 35mm from track to underside of the bridge. Again thank you all for your help.
Tom
The 33mm was measured from the baseboard level to the tops of the pantographs. When I reported that I was forgetting that the measurements didn't start from the end of the ruler, so the clearance you've actually got is about 9mm. Should be plenty.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.349 seconds